I recently received an email from a colleague of mine, James R. McKown, CEO of Recovery Data Connect, L.L.C., notifying me about a 9^th circuit decision emphasizing three major factors in the case: plan language creating an automatic lien, rejecting the Made Whole Doctrine and preventing the plaintiff from challenging related medical claims due to a Sworn Declaration.  To read the entire 9^th circuit decision, Laborers v. Hill, United States District Court for the Northern District of California (November 25, 2008). Click Here

Tags:

This entry was posted by Adam V. Russo on Thursday, December 4th, 2008 at 5:09 pm and is filed under 9th. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.