<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Passion for Subro &#187; Supreme Court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.passionforsubro.com/category/supreme-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com</link>
	<description>The personal subrogation blog of Attorney Adam V. Russo.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:03:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A Guide to the Supreme Court&#8217;s Review of the 2010 Health Care Reform Law</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/supreme-court/a-guide-to-the-supreme-courts-review-of-the-2010-health-care-reform-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/supreme-court/a-guide-to-the-supreme-courts-review-of-the-2010-health-care-reform-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Care Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=8716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the Supreme Court preparing to hear oral arguments about challenges to the 2010 Affordable Care Act in March 2012, this Kaiser Family Foundation brief serves as a primer on the pending case, which challenges the constitutionality both of the law&#8217;s individual mandate that requires most Americans to obtain health insurance and of provisions requiring [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/supreme-court/a-guide-to-the-supreme-courts-review-of-the-2010-health-care-reform-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kaiser Health Tracking Poll &#8212; January 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/supreme-court/kaiser-health-tracking-poll-january-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/supreme-court/kaiser-health-tracking-poll-january-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 12:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Care Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=8692</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the Supreme Court prepares to hear legal challenges to the health reform law in March, most Americans expect the Justices to base their ruling on their own ideological views rather than their interpretation of the law, according to the January Health Tracking Poll. Other key findings include: http://www.kff.org/kaiserpolls/8274.cfm]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/supreme-court/kaiser-health-tracking-poll-january-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>3rd Circuit Limits Full ERISA Remedy, Saying It Would Unjustly Enrich Plan</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/erisa/3rd-circuit-limits-full-erisa-remedy-saying-it-would-unjustly-enrich-plan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/erisa/3rd-circuit-limits-full-erisa-remedy-saying-it-would-unjustly-enrich-plan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[3rd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ERISA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self-Funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=8598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Coordination Of Benefits             January 2012 Vol. 20 No. 1  In a surprising decision, the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals used the concept of “appropriate equitable relief” to restrict an employer sponsored health plan’s recovery from a third-party settlement to less than what the plan paid out in health benefits. In US Airways, Inc. v. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/erisa/3rd-circuit-limits-full-erisa-remedy-saying-it-would-unjustly-enrich-plan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>States File Brief in Support of Health Reform Law</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/supreme-court/states-file-brief-in-support-of-health-reform-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/supreme-court/states-file-brief-in-support-of-health-reform-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 21:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Care Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPACA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=8571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[January 17, 2011 (PLANSPONSOR.com) – California Attorney General Kamala D. Harris has filed a friend-of-the-court brief in the U.S. Supreme Court supporting the constitutionality of federal health care reform and urging the high court to uphold the law.  Harris, joined by 12 other attorneys general, argued in the brief that the Constitution gives Congress broad [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/supreme-court/states-file-brief-in-support-of-health-reform-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nearly 500 state lawmakers to press Supreme Court to uphold healthcare mandate</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/supreme-court/nearly-500-state-lawmakers-to-press-supreme-court-to-uphold-healthcare-mandate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/supreme-court/nearly-500-state-lawmakers-to-press-supreme-court-to-uphold-healthcare-mandate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Care Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=8539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More than 480 state lawmakers plan to file a brief Thursday urging the Supreme Court to uphold President Obama&#8217;s healthcare law.  The group includes at least one lawmaker from every state, including the 26 states whose attorneys general are suing to overturn the healthcare law&#8217;s individual insurance mandate. The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/supreme-court/nearly-500-state-lawmakers-to-press-supreme-court-to-uphold-healthcare-mandate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>State Parity Law Trumps ERISA Plan’s Exclusion, So Case Against Plan Advances</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/erisa/state-parity-law-trumps-erisa-plan%e2%80%99s-exclusion-so-case-against-plan-advances/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/erisa/state-parity-law-trumps-erisa-plan%e2%80%99s-exclusion-so-case-against-plan-advances/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 15:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ERISA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mental Health Parity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPACA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Preemption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=8477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Employer’s Guide to Self-Insuring Health Benefits      January 2012 &#124; Vol. 19, No. 4  As illustrated here, ERISA did not preempt the Washington Mental Health Parity Act.  Even though it correctly applied an insured ERISA plan’s coverage restrictions on neurodevelopmental therapy for children over six years old, the administrator’s refusal to pay a 10-year-old dependent’s mental [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/erisa/state-parity-law-trumps-erisa-plan%e2%80%99s-exclusion-so-case-against-plan-advances/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Health-Law Opponents Try to Add Plaintiffs to Lawsuit</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/supreme-court/health-law-opponents-try-to-add-plaintiffs-to-lawsuit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/supreme-court/health-law-opponents-try-to-add-plaintiffs-to-lawsuit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 22:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Care Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=8441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A small-business group fighting President Barack Obama&#8217;s health-care law asked the Supreme Court on Wednesday to add two plaintiffs to its lawsuit after possible problems arose with an initial plaintiff. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204331304577141072540030502.html?KEYWORDS=medicaid]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/supreme-court/health-law-opponents-try-to-add-plaintiffs-to-lawsuit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AHIP AND BCBSA FILE AMICUS BRIEF IN U.S. SUPREME COURT</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/supreme-court/ahip-and-bcbsa-file-amicus-brief-in-u-s-supreme-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/supreme-court/ahip-and-bcbsa-file-amicus-brief-in-u-s-supreme-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 22:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Care Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=8431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Industry files brief on issue of severability; Insurance market reforms and coverage requirement cannot be separated AHIP and BCBSA today filed an amicus brief in the U.S. Supreme Court stating that certain insurance market reforms in the Affordable Care Act (ACA) are inextricably linked to the law’s personal coverage requirement and have to be severed from [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/supreme-court/ahip-and-bcbsa-file-amicus-brief-in-u-s-supreme-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SPBA&#8217;s Fred Hunt: State of the TPA Industry &amp; Forecast for 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/stop-loss/spbas-fred-hunt-state-of-the-tpa-industry-forecast-for-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/stop-loss/spbas-fred-hunt-state-of-the-tpa-industry-forecast-for-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 01:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plan Sponsor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPACA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stop Loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Third Party Administrators]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=8359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[www.myhealthguide.com MyHealthGuide Source: Fred Hunt, Active Past President, SPBA, 12/2012, www.SPBATPA.org The state of TPAs and the forecast for the future is the brightest it has been for many years (not to say that it is not an extremely tight marketplace). Background and Mood TThis article is useful for perspective in shaping corporate strategy, but [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/stop-loss/spbas-fred-hunt-state-of-the-tpa-industry-forecast-for-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Decision on Health Reform Will Give Clarity to Business</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/4th/supreme-court-decision-on-health-reform-will-give-clarity-to-business/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/4th/supreme-court-decision-on-health-reform-will-give-clarity-to-business/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 01:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[11th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPACA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington D.C.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=8291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Employer’s Guide to Self-Insuring Health Benefits     December 2011 &#124; Vol. 19, No.3  The U.S. Supreme Court definitively announced on Nov. 14 it will decide the question of whether Congress exceeded its powers to regulate commerce when it decided to require people to buy health insurance (that is, whether the individual mandate is allowed under the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/4th/supreme-court-decision-on-health-reform-will-give-clarity-to-business/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

