Phia Group Russo & Minchoff

Important Victory for Subrogation Efforts in the Face of New York Law

cmonfils | July 11, 2011

The Subrogator       Spring/Summer 2011

Amidst the deluge of healthcare reform, anti-subrogation legislation was passed in the State of New York on November 12, 2009, which purported to eliminate the right of fully insured carriers and self-funded benefit plans, coming within the purview of state law, to pursue subrogation and reimbursement. Accordingly, benefit plans in New York which are not private, self-funded plans, no longer have an enforceable right to subrogation and/or reimbursement. The Phia Group has never accepted anti-subrogation legislation without a fight. When the Phia Group received word of the statutory shift, its attorneys immediately began to seek out ways to enforce plan rights. (more…)

Single-Payer Coverage Eyed in New York State

cmonfils | July 4, 2011

www.pnhp.org      By Douglas Turner   The Buffalo News, June 20, 2011

WASHINGTON — Conservative House Republicans, flush from their 2010 victory over the perceived overreach of the Obama health care law, flooded the Capitol with heroic-sounding legislation last winter. (more…)

The Phia Group’s Case Makes the Coordination of Benefits Handbook

cmonfils | May 3, 2011

Coordination of Benefits              April 2011 | Vol. 19, No. 2 

New York Trial Court Lets Health Plan Intervene in Malpractice Action 

Until recently, all the cases we see involving subrogation and reimbursement involve situations where someone who incurred serious medical expenses and received a favorable tort settlement ends up in competition with his or her own health plan exercising reimbursement rights on the settlement or judgment proceeds. 

We are now beginning to see cases where the plan participant has died from the injuries leading to the tort settlement or judgment, and the deceased plan participant’s family seeks to recover damages for their own loss arising from the plan participant’s death, usually based on state statutes providing for a cause of action by those family members in those circumstances.  (more…)

Amicus Committee Update Bills in New York

cmonfils | April 26, 2011

www.subrogation.org

New York Senate Bill 4576

The New York anti-subrogation law is back!  The latest bill seeks to clarify and expand limits on subrogation.  As you may remember, in 2009 the State of New York passed a law that eliminated subrogation and reimbursements rights for health and disability plans in personal injury and wrongful death actions based upon settlement of a claim.   (more…)

Challenge to NY Subrogation Ban Rejected; No Eligible Defendant

cmonfils | March 1, 2011

Thompson Publishing       January 2011        Volume. 19, No. 1

New York late in 2009 barred subrogation and reimbursement rights for insured health plans. While it seems clear that the New York law does not apply to self-insured ERISA health plans, a health insurer’s preemptive attempt to force the issue was rejected by the U.S. District Court for Western New York. Citizen suits against states are barred by the 11th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, and a lawsuit to compel a government official is limited to targeting only the official who has purview for enforcement of the challenged provision — and then only if the official actively enforced it, the court said. New York’s Attorney General (now Governor) Andrew Cuomo (D) has done nothing to challenge any self-insured ERISA plan’s use of subrogation and has said he had no intention of doing so. (more…)

Important Victory for Subrogation Efforts in the Face of New York Law

cmonfils | January 6, 2011

January 6, 2011

Anti-subrogation legislation was passed in the State of New York on November 12, 2009, which purported to eliminate the right of fully insured carriers and self-funded benefit plans, coming within the purview of state law, to pursue subrogation and reimbursement. We here at The Phia Group have never accepted anti-subrogation legislation without a fight. When we received word of the statutory shift, our attorneys immediately devised ways to enforce plan rights. (more…)

Healthnow New York vs. State of New York

Adam V. Russo | October 6, 2010

Lawsuit by an ERISA plan sponsor challenging New York’s anti-subrogation statute.

Click the link below to see the Court’s September 13th decision:

http://www.erisaboard.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=1534&d=1284573407

State Health Care Reform Update

Adam V. Russo | August 12, 2010

CCH® BENEFITS, www.hr.cch.com

California

The California Public Employee’s Retirement System (CalPERS) has approved an average increase of more than 9% in health premiums next year for state and local government workers. CalPERS blamed the rate increase on rising costs for hospital care, doctor visits, and prescriptions. The increase will mean higher premiums for public agencies and their 1.3 million employees, dependents, and retirees. For more information, visit http://www.calpers.ca.gov/. (more…)

New York: PPACA

Adam V. Russo | June 28, 2010

New York. Governor David Patterson recently signed a bill into law that reinstates the New York State Insurance Department’s authority to review and approve health insurance premium increases before they take effect. The law will apply to all rate increases taking effect on or after Oct. 1, 2010. Since 2000, New York had regulated health insurance premiums under a law that limited the state’s ability to disapprove health insurance premium increases and allowed the insurance industry to self-regulate. The new law also requires health insurers to spend more of every premium dollar on medical costs and not administrative expenses. Under the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, health insurers will be required to report justifications for “unreasonable” rates increases, as well as the percentage of premiums spent on claims, quality of care, taxes, and administrative costs. In addition, the Department of Health and Human Services recently announced the availability of $51 million in Health Insurance Premium Review grants under the Affordable Care Act. For more information, visit http://www.ins.state.ny.us/.

Southern District of New York Holds New York Collateral Source Statute Does Not Abrogate Subrogation Rights

Adam V. Russo | March 22, 2010

By Lindsey C. Bruning and Kristin C. Cummings, Zelle Hoffman Voelbel & Mason LLP, Dallas, Texas

New York, like many states, has a collateral source statute that prevents an injured party from recovering from a tortfeasor amounts that the injured party has already received from another source, such as insurance proceeds. (N.Y. C.P.L.R. 4545) CPLR 4545 requires a court to reduce any damages awarded to a plaintiff by the amount the plaintiff has received from any collateral source. (more…)

To Our Valued Clientele and the Health Benefit Industry as a Whole:

Adam V. Russo | January 18, 2010

Recently, the State of New York passed into law a statute which many trial lawyers and members of our industry are calling the “anti-subrogation law.” While the law may limit subrogation rights in the State, we certainly feel that the matter deserves more investigation. Over the past few months we at The Phia Group have been researching the issue and have created new procedures to protect reimbursement rights to the highest degree possible. All payers in New York need to seek out ways to protect their rights to pursue reimbursements for charges arising from third party responsibility. We want all of you to know that The Phia Group can help. (more…)

ANTI-SUBROGATION BILL PASSED IN NEW YORK

Adam V. Russo | November 18, 2009

The bill will eliminate subrogation and reimbursement rights for fully-insured health insurance plans in New York. The actual ramifications of this new legislation will not ne known until it has been tested in trial and appellate courts have had a chance to interpret the new law and its implications. (more…)

New York

Adam V. Russo | November 13, 2009

An anti-subrogation bill attempting to bar subrogation claims related to personal injury is still pending and expected to be seen again in New York’s next legislative session.

NY Anti Subro Bill

Adam V. Russo | November 11, 2009

New York took the drastic step yesterday of passing a law that eliminates subrogation and reimbursement rights for numerous lines of business. Last night the New York Assembly and Senate passed the anti-subrogation bill. Although the bill was passed by both chambers, they are technically awaiting on the governor’s signature.

State Laws for Balance Billing

Adam V. Russo | February 4, 2009

Forty-seven states ban in-network providers from billing insured patients more than their required copayment or deductible and federal law prohibits providers from billing Medicare beneficiaries for unpaid balances. Some states also ban additional charges for insured patients who seek care from out-of-network providers and emergency departments. While national statistics on the practice are unavailable, economists and patient advocates estimate that consumers pay at least $1 billion annually for medical bills that they are not legally responsible to pay. (more…)