<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Passion for Subro &#187; New York</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.passionforsubro.com/category/state-law/new-york/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com</link>
	<description>The personal subrogation blog of Attorney Adam V. Russo.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:03:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Recent State Law Changes May Impact Your Health and Welfare Program</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/state-law/california/recent-state-law-changes-may-impact-your-health-and-welfare-program/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/state-law/california/recent-state-law-changes-may-impact-your-health-and-welfare-program/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 00:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rhode Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=8355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a general rule, state insurance laws apply to employer-sponsored insured group health plans but not self-insured group health plans. The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA) generally exempts group health plans sponsored by private sector employers from state insurance laws. However, because insurers must comply with state insurance laws, a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/state-law/california/recent-state-law-changes-may-impact-your-health-and-welfare-program/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2012 Assessments Under the New York Health Care Reform Act</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/state-law/new-york/2012-assessments-under-the-new-york-health-care-reform-act/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/state-law/new-york/2012-assessments-under-the-new-york-health-care-reform-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 03:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Care Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=8150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Covered lives assessments under the New York Health Care Reform Act (HCRA) that are determined by county of residence will be higher in 2012 than in 2011 for both individuals and families in all eight State regions. The percentage increases range from just under 1 percent to more than 8 percent. However, the set percentage [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/state-law/new-york/2012-assessments-under-the-new-york-health-care-reform-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>State Health Care Reform Update</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/state-law/california/state-health-care-reform-update-23/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/state-law/california/state-health-care-reform-update-23/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 14:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louisiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=8064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[from Spencer’s Benefits Reports: For the last few years, states have been leading the way toward more comprehensive health care coverage to ensure that more people have or can obtain health insurance. With the passage of federal health care reform, states will have increasing responsibilities in regard to employer-provided health insurance benefits. Spencer’s Benefits Reports [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/state-law/california/state-health-care-reform-update-23/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>N.Y. Health Insurers Ordered To Refund $114.5M To Policyholders</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/state-law/new-york/n-y-health-insurers-ordered-to-refund-114-5m-to-policyholders/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/state-law/new-york/n-y-health-insurers-ordered-to-refund-114-5m-to-policyholders/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 12:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=7832</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ALBANY, N.Y.—Eleven health insurers have been ordered to refund $114.5 million to policyholders in New York under minimum medical spending requirements similar to those being enacted nationwide under health care reform beginning this year. http://www.businessinsurance.com/article/20111109/NEWS03/111109852?tags=&#124;62&#124;307&#124;306&#124;74&#124;305&#124;87]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/state-law/new-york/n-y-health-insurers-ordered-to-refund-114-5m-to-policyholders/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cuomo Signs NY Autism Treatment Insurance Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/state-law/new-york/cuomo-signs-ny-autism-treatment-insurance-bill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/state-law/new-york/cuomo-signs-ny-autism-treatment-insurance-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 12:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=7828</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ALBANY, N.Y. — New York soon will require insurers to cover screening, diagnosis and treatment for autism spectrum disorders, which will increase premiums for all individuals and businesses.  Supporters say the new law will include routine toddler screenings, behavioral health treatments, speech therapy, occupational therapy and physical therapy. That should bolster early and effective treatment [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/state-law/new-york/cuomo-signs-ny-autism-treatment-insurance-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York Autism Mandate Follows National Trend</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/state-law/new-york/new-york-autism-mandate-follows-national-trend/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/state-law/new-york/new-york-autism-mandate-follows-national-trend/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 20:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=7811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New York insurance companies that were not covering the screening, diagnosis and treatment for autism spectrum disorders will now be mandated to do so effective Nov. 1, 2012.  New York is the 29th state to pass some version of Ryan&#8217;s Law, a bill that started in South Carolina in 2005 after Lorri Unumb, who was [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/state-law/new-york/new-york-autism-mandate-follows-national-trend/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Late News: AHA, lawmakers to consider raising Medicare eligibility age</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/state-law/california/late-news-aha-lawmakers-to-consider-raising-medicare-eligibility-age/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/state-law/california/late-news-aha-lawmakers-to-consider-raising-medicare-eligibility-age/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 16:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=7501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[www.modernhealthcare.com By Modern Healthcare   Posted: October 3, 2011 &#8211; 12:01 am ET Raising the Medicare eligibility age to 67 will be among a host of topics American Hospital Association members will discuss with lawmakers this week during the group’s advocacy meeting in Washington. “This is an idea that has been put forward by House Democrats, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/state-law/california/late-news-aha-lawmakers-to-consider-raising-medicare-eligibility-age/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York Trial Court Won’t Let Plan Intervene in Tort Lawsuit</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/state-law/new-york/new-york-trial-court-won%e2%80%99t-let-plan-intervene-in-tort-lawsuit-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/state-law/new-york/new-york-trial-court-won%e2%80%99t-let-plan-intervene-in-tort-lawsuit-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 16:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=7301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Coordination of Benefits Employee Benefits Series  THOMPSON  July 2011 &#124; VOL. 19, No.3 Legal Brief Contrary to two recent decisions, a health plan in New York failed in its effort to intervene in a plan participant’s lawsuit against a third party, which would have let the plan in on settlement negotiations or made it a party to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/state-law/new-york/new-york-trial-court-won%e2%80%99t-let-plan-intervene-in-tort-lawsuit-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NASP Amicus Committee Update &#8211; FEHB Plan Recoveries Under Attack</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/subrogation/nasp-amicus-committee-update-fehb-plan-recoveries-under-attack/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/subrogation/nasp-amicus-committee-update-fehb-plan-recoveries-under-attack/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 16:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subrogation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=7130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[www.subrogation.org Federal Employee Health Benefit Plan Recoveries Under Attack  Recently, four putative class action lawsuits, challenging a Federal Employee Health Benefits plans&#8217; right to recover or subrogate, have been filed.  The suits, one filed in New York and the others filed in Missouri, allege that the Federal Employee Health Benefit Act (FEHBA) does not preempt [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/subrogation/nasp-amicus-committee-update-fehb-plan-recoveries-under-attack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Press Release &#8211; Regarding Recent Lawsuit Filed In New York State Relating To Collateral Source Rule And Rights Of Medicare Advantage Plans To Seek Reimbursement</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/state-law/new-york/press-release-regarding-recent-lawsuit-filed-in-new-york-state-relating-to-collateral-source-rule-and-rights-of-medicare-advantage-plans-to-seek-reimbursement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/state-law/new-york/press-release-regarding-recent-lawsuit-filed-in-new-york-state-relating-to-collateral-source-rule-and-rights-of-medicare-advantage-plans-to-seek-reimbursement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 16:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Collateral Source Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reimbursement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=7125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Braintree, Massachusetts 08/23/11 &#8211; A class action lawsuit was recently filed in the State of New York (Rebecca Meek-Horton v. Trover Solutions, Inc. et.al, State of New York, Supreme Court, New York County, Case No. 108804-2011), which alleges that Medicare Advantage Plans violate a New York State law when they impose liens on participants who [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/state-law/new-york/press-release-regarding-recent-lawsuit-filed-in-new-york-state-relating-to-collateral-source-rule-and-rights-of-medicare-advantage-plans-to-seek-reimbursement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

