Archive for the ‘New Jersey’ Category

Court Moves Forward Claim Employer Interfered with Health Benefits

January 29, 2010 | 3rd, Claims Procedures, Conflict of Interest, Federal Circuits, New Jersey | No Comments

January 22, 2010 (PLANSPONSOR.com) – A federal court has refused to dismiss a claim by a Jersey Construction employee that he was fired for pursuing health benefits for his wife’s chemotherapy.

The U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey said it found that Christian Pailleret stated sufficient facts to support a prima facie case under § 510 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). The court said Pailleret had no “smoking gun” evidence of intent, but the fact that almost immediately after he submitted medical claims of tens of thousands of dollars, he was assigned low-level and “degrading” tasks and shortly after that was terminated without notice or explanation was sufficient to show a plausible claim and “to thus unlock the doors of discovery.” Read more

State Laws for Balance Billing

February 4, 2009 | California, Florida, Idaho, Kentucky, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Vermont | No Comments

Forty-seven states ban in-network providers from billing insured patients more than their required copayment or deductible and federal law prohibits providers from billing Medicare beneficiaries for unpaid balances. Some states also ban additional charges for insured patients who seek care from out-of-network providers and emergency departments. While national statistics on the practice are unavailable, economists and patient advocates estimate that consumers pay at least $1 billion annually for medical bills that they are not legally responsible to pay. Read more

New Subro Laws Among Auto Policies

June 11, 2008 | Colorado, New Jersey, Subrogation | No Comments

Colorado:

June 5, 2008, Colorado Governor, Bill Ritter approved Senate Bill 11, abolishing subrogation for all medical payment coverage under auto insurance policies to be in effect of January 1, 2009.  The new Colorado law will be in effect as of January 1, 2009. Read more

The Purchase of Stop-Loss From a Reinsurer Will Not Void ERISA Status

November 13, 2007 | Claims Procedures, ERISA, Litigation, New Jersey, Provider Reimbursement, Stop Loss, Third Party Administrators | No Comments

On September 25, 2007, a Federal District Court in New Jersey held in Mulholland v. UFCW Local 1776 Participating Employers Health and Welfare Fund, 2007 WL 2814648 (DNJ) that the purchase of stop loss insurance does not preclude self-funded ERISA status. The court went on to say that because self-funded plans can come close to becoming a fully insured plan, the question is not whether a self-funded plan has reinsurance, but rather, how high is their specific deductible. In other words, does the self-funded plan retain considerable risk of loss, or, does the Plan purchase an excessive amount of stop-loss insurance? Read more