<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Passion for Subro &#187; Colorado</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.passionforsubro.com/category/state-law/colorado/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com</link>
	<description>The personal subrogation blog of Attorney Adam V. Russo.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:03:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Colorado Federal Court Reaffirms Principle That Purchase of Stop Loss Insurance Does Not Affect Self-Insured Status of Plan</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/stop-loss/colorado-federal-court-reaffirms-principle-that-purchase-of-stop-loss-insurance-does-not-affect-self-insured-status-of-plan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/stop-loss/colorado-federal-court-reaffirms-principle-that-purchase-of-stop-loss-insurance-does-not-affect-self-insured-status-of-plan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 14:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self-Funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stop Loss]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=8073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Self-Insurer   November 2011 Issue &#38; Volume 37    From the Bench    By Thomas Croft, Esq. (Goyen v. Vail Corp., No. 10-cv-02392, in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, September 26, 2011). If it weren’t for the recent brouhaha spawned by the NAIC’s criticisms of stop loss insurance, this case would be [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/stop-loss/colorado-federal-court-reaffirms-principle-that-purchase-of-stop-loss-insurance-does-not-affect-self-insured-status-of-plan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>States Move To Implement Health Reform Provisions</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/state-law/california/states-move-to-implement-health-reform-provisions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/state-law/california/states-move-to-implement-health-reform-provisions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 17:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawaii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wyoming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=7305</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[www.hr.cch.com CCH® BENEFITS — 09/01/11 from Spencer’s Benefits Reports: According to the Kaiser Family Foundation’s State Health Facts, 23 states have established American Health Benefit Exchanges under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), have enacted legislation with the intent to establish an Exchange, or have Exchange legislation pending. Massachusetts and Vermont have established [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/state-law/california/states-move-to-implement-health-reform-provisions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>State Health Care Reform Update</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/state-law/california/state-health-care-reform-update-20/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/state-law/california/state-health-care-reform-update-20/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 14:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wyoming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=5788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[www.hr.cch.com      CCH® BENEFITS — 04/04/11 from Spencer’s Benefits Reports: For the last few years, states have been leading the way toward more comprehensive health care coverage to ensure that more people have or can obtain health insurance. With the passage of federal health care reform, states will have increasing responsibilities in regard to employer-provided health [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/state-law/california/state-health-care-reform-update-20/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Colorado: PPACA</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/state-law/colorado/colorado-ppaca/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/state-law/colorado/colorado-ppaca/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 18:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam V. Russo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care Legislation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=3423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Colorado. Gov. Bill Ritter recently signed eight health care bills into law. The bills included one to mandate that individual and small group health insurance policies cover contraception and pregnancy. Other bills included the establishment of a reward system for Coloradans who report Medicaid fraud, and the establishment of an advisory committee to make recommendations [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/state-law/colorado/colorado-ppaca/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Colorado Anti-Subrogation Law Update</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/subrogation/colorado-anti-subrogation-law-update/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/subrogation/colorado-anti-subrogation-law-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 14:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam V. Russo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subrogation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=3354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As you may have heard, a law was just passed in Colorado which devastates subrogation and reimbursement efforts in that State, under State law. This only applies to fully funded insurance carriers, and self-funded benefit plans which obey State law, such as governmental entities and houses of worship. Not only does C.R.S. § 10-1-135, which [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/subrogation/colorado-anti-subrogation-law-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Colorado HB 1168/ Amended &amp; Passed by Judiciary Committee</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/subrogation/colorado-hb-1168-amended-passed-by-judiciary-committee/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/subrogation/colorado-hb-1168-amended-passed-by-judiciary-committee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 15:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam V. Russo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subrogation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=2226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President-Elect Kenneth Levine and Amicus Committee Chair Daran Kiefer spent Monday February 22nd in Colorado with several NASP members and industry lobbyists testifying in opposition to House bill 1168. During the eight hours at the Capital, the parties supporting this bill agreed to several amendments. First, the bill was amended to eliminate property, workers’ compensation [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/subrogation/colorado-hb-1168-amended-passed-by-judiciary-committee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trial Lawyer Hypocrisy Act</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/subrogation/trial-lawyer-hypocrisy-act/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/subrogation/trial-lawyer-hypocrisy-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 14:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam V. Russo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subrogation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=2100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Mark Hillman If there&#8217;s one thing personal injury lawyers are especially good at, it&#8217;s exploiting the misfortunes of their clients while devising new ways to line their own pockets. Colorado House Bill 1168 is this year&#8217;s prime example. While claiming to help injured parties receive full compensation for damages caused by the fault of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/subrogation/trial-lawyer-hypocrisy-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Colorado:  House Bill 10-1168 Threatens Healthcare Subrogation and Limits All Subrogation – No Direct Actions by Carriers</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/subrogation/colorado-house-bill-10-1168-threatens-healthcare-subrogation-and-limits-all-subrogation-%e2%80%93-no-direct-actions-by-carriers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/subrogation/colorado-house-bill-10-1168-threatens-healthcare-subrogation-and-limits-all-subrogation-%e2%80%93-no-direct-actions-by-carriers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 14:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam V. Russo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subrogation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=2081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Subrogation rights are again in danger in Colorado with the introduction of H.B. 10-1168. This bill essentially undoes healthcare subrogation while codifying the “made whole” and “common fund” doctrines into law. The proposed bill will certainly have a devastating effect on healthcare, workers compensation and UM insurance subrogation, but other auto and property subrogation rights [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/subrogation/colorado-house-bill-10-1168-threatens-healthcare-subrogation-and-limits-all-subrogation-%e2%80%93-no-direct-actions-by-carriers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Medical Malpractice Caps Should Be Raised In Colorado</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/medical-malpractice/why-medical-malpractice-caps-should-be-raised-in-colorado/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/medical-malpractice/why-medical-malpractice-caps-should-be-raised-in-colorado/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 16:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam V. Russo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Malpractice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=815</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Glorianna Scott, Denver Legal News Examniner, www.examiner.com Colorado State Representative Christine Scanlan is expected to sponsor a bill to increase statutory caps on medical malpractice lawsuits. A similar bill, sponsored by Representative Terrance Carroll, failed last year. With only five weeks left in this session, Scanlan&#8217;s bill may be difficult to pass, but here&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/medical-malpractice/why-medical-malpractice-caps-should-be-raised-in-colorado/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Subro Laws Among Auto Policies</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/subrogation/new-subro-laws-among-auto-policies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/subrogation/new-subro-laws-among-auto-policies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 15:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam V. Russo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subrogation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/subrogation/new-subro-laws-among-auto-policies/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Colorado: June 5, 2008, Colorado Governor, Bill Ritter approved Senate Bill 11, abolishing subrogation for all medical payment coverage under auto insurance policies to be in effect of January 1, 2009.  The new Colorado law will be in effect as of January 1, 2009. According to the bill and recent addition of subsection 3(a) of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/subrogation/new-subro-laws-among-auto-policies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

