Adam V. Russo | July 9, 2010
Sandra Chronister was employed as a nurse at Baptist Health in Arkansas. In 1995, she was injured in a car accident, and thereafter sought disability benefits under Baptist Health’s long-term disability plan, which was insured and administered by Unum Life Insurance Co. of America. Unum initially granted her application for disability benefits. At Unum’s urging, [...]
Category: 8th, Conflict of Interest, MetLife v. Glenn, Standings |
No Comments »
Tags:
Adam V. Russo | November 28, 2007
There is a recent newsworthy item that I wish to discuss, as it is pertinent to our industry. The November 20, 2007 Wall Street Journal featured an extremely negative cover story, relating to the self-insured industry’s subrogation activities under ERISA. These types of prominent news stories do nothing for the self-insured industry except motivate the [...]
Category: Claims Procedures, Claims Review, ERISA, Litigation, News, Provider Reimbursement, Signed Subrogation Agreements, Standings, Subrogation, Summary Plan Description, Third Party Administrators |
3 Comments »
Tags:
Adam V. Russo | November 13, 2007
In the case of Bauhaus USA, Inc. v. Lillie Regina Holmes Copeland, et. al., 2007 Miss. LEXIS 545 (September 27, 2007), a self-funded Plan coming under the purview of ERISA sought reimbursement of claims it had paid on behalf of a minor child. The court took possession of funds in order to create a trust [...]
Category: ERISA, Minor's Compromise, Mississippi, Preemption, Provider Reimbursement, Standings |
No Comments »
Tags:
Adam V. Russo | July 18, 2007
The Southern District Court of Indiana held on February 8, 2007 in South Central Indiana School Trust v. Virginia Poyner, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9368, that “in Sereboff, the Supreme Court held that Great-West did not apply to a situation where the third-party proceeds were segregated and hence “specifically identifiable.” Sereboff, 126 S.Ct. at 1874. [...]
Category: 7th, Claims Procedures, Standings |
No Comments »
Tags:
Adam V. Russo | April 4, 2007
In this case, an employee of a company with a self funded ERISA plan was receiving benefits due to her disabled status. The TPA hired a physician to re-examine the employee, and based on her diagnosis, terminated benefits. The physician determined that the employee could perform sedentary work, which meant she was no longer “disabled” [...]
Category: ERISA, Litigation, Plan Language, Standings, Third Party Administrators |
No Comments »
Tags:
Adam V. Russo | April 4, 2007
In March of 2005, Poyner was injured when an automobile struck her while she was riding her bicycle and received nearly $ 200,000.00 in medical benefits. Subsequently she recovered $ 10,000.00 from the insurer of the automobile which struck her and $100,000.00 from her own under insured motorist coverage. The Plan attempted to persuade Poyner [...]
Category: ERISA, Litigation, Provider Reimbursement, Standings |
No Comments »
Tags:
Adam V. Russo | April 4, 2007
This case arose from a Plan’s failure to add an employee’s dependents to an ERISA welfare benefit plan. As a benefit of employment, the employer offered its employees health insurance. Under the Plan, the employer was both a “participant” and the “Plan Administrator.” Employees were instructed to direct their inquiries about the Plan to their [...]
Category: Claims Procedures, ERISA, Fiduciary Liability, Plan Language, Standings, Third Party Administrators |
No Comments »
Tags:
Adam V. Russo | April 4, 2007
Section 502(a)(3)(B) of ERISA permits a fiduciary to bring a civil action “to obtain equitable relief to enforce the terms of the plan”. To obtain this “equitable relief,” the basis for the fiduciary’s claim and the relief it seeks must be equitable in nature. Importantly, a fiduciary cannot seek to impose personal liability, as that [...]
Category: Claims Procedures, ERISA, Federal Circuits, Fiduciary Liability, Provider Reimbursement, Standings |
No Comments »
Tags: