<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Passion for Subro &#187; Medical Malpractice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.passionforsubro.com/category/medical-malpractice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com</link>
	<description>The personal subrogation blog of Attorney Adam V. Russo.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:03:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Reimbursement Limited to Extent Benefits Were Due to a Doctor’s Negligence</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/medical-malpractice/reimbursement-limited-to-extent-benefits-were-due-to-a-doctor%e2%80%99s-negligence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/medical-malpractice/reimbursement-limited-to-extent-benefits-were-due-to-a-doctor%e2%80%99s-negligence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 15:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Medical Malpractice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reimbursement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=5401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thompson Publishing          January 2011             Volume. 19, No. 1 In just about every case reported in connection with a plan’s right to reimbursement for benefits paid on account of an injury or illness, it appears that there was no question that the tort settlement proceeds resulted from the negligence of a third party. But what happens [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/medical-malpractice/reimbursement-limited-to-extent-benefits-were-due-to-a-doctor%e2%80%99s-negligence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MedMal RRGs Spared from Anti-Trust Legislation</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/medical-malpractice/medmal-rrgs-spared-from-anti-trust-legislation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/medical-malpractice/medmal-rrgs-spared-from-anti-trust-legislation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 13:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam V. Russo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Care Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Malpractice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=2136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WASHINGTON, D.C., Feb. 22, 2010 &#8211; The Self-Insurance Institute of America, Inc. (SIIA) today saluted the exclusion of medical malpractice insurance from a Congressional bill that would eliminate portions of the McCarran-Ferguson Act in governing the insurance industry. &#8220;This decision by Congress will preserve the existing ability of self-insured risk retention groups to provide medical [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/medical-malpractice/medmal-rrgs-spared-from-anti-trust-legislation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hawaii</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/subrogation/hawaii/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/subrogation/hawaii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 22:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam V. Russo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hawaii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Malpractice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subrogation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workers' Compensation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=1719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 2009, several medical malpractice tort reform bills were introduced to eliminate subrogation rights for all types of lines, including workers’ compensation, health and disability.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/subrogation/hawaii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Medical Malpractice Caps Should Be Raised In Colorado</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/medical-malpractice/why-medical-malpractice-caps-should-be-raised-in-colorado/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/medical-malpractice/why-medical-malpractice-caps-should-be-raised-in-colorado/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 16:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam V. Russo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Malpractice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=815</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Glorianna Scott, Denver Legal News Examniner, www.examiner.com Colorado State Representative Christine Scanlan is expected to sponsor a bill to increase statutory caps on medical malpractice lawsuits. A similar bill, sponsored by Representative Terrance Carroll, failed last year. With only five weeks left in this session, Scanlan&#8217;s bill may be difficult to pass, but here&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/medical-malpractice/why-medical-malpractice-caps-should-be-raised-in-colorado/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

