<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Passion for Subro &#187; Litigation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.passionforsubro.com/category/litigation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com</link>
	<description>The personal subrogation blog of Attorney Adam V. Russo.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:03:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Different Worlds Of Litigation In Property And Casualty Subro V. Healthcare Subro</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/litigation/the-different-worlds-of-litigation-in-property-and-casualty-subro-v-healthcare-subro/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/litigation/the-different-worlds-of-litigation-in-property-and-casualty-subro-v-healthcare-subro/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 14:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subrogation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=7486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Subrogator Fall 2011 By Robert Marcinco, Strategic Recovery Partnership, INC. Litigation any case is often a matter of weighing risk and analyzing cost against benefit. In the property &#38; casualty (P&#38;C) world of subrogation, the analysis is often a “Harder” objected one, driven by calculations of the costs involved predicated on specific facts and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/litigation/the-different-worlds-of-litigation-in-property-and-casualty-subro-v-healthcare-subro/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Employers Struggle To Control Wage-And-Hour Litigation</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/litigation/employers-struggle-to-control-wage-and-hour-litigation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/litigation/employers-struggle-to-control-wage-and-hour-litigation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 16:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=6534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[www.businessinsurance.com      May 30, 2011     Judy Greenwald Wage-and-hour lawsuits are becoming a major concern for employers as more suits are filed, observers say.  The complexity of federal and state laws, the relative ease of winning class action certification and workers laid off as a result of the weak economy have led to more litigation in recent [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/litigation/employers-struggle-to-control-wage-and-hour-litigation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Community Health Systems receives SEC subpoena</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/litigation/community-health-systems-receives-sec-subpoena/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/litigation/community-health-systems-receives-sec-subpoena/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2011 23:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=6421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[www.modernhealthcare.com By Vince Galloro     Posted: May 18, 2011 &#8211; 5:45 pm ET The Securities and Exchange Commission issued a subpoena to Community Health Systems for documents related to the various probes of its emergency room practices and observation visits, according to a company securities filing.The Franklin, Tenn., company received the subpoena on May 13. The [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/litigation/community-health-systems-receives-sec-subpoena/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judge Dismisses Challenge to Wellness Program’s Compliance with the ADA</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/litigation/judge-dismisses-challenge-to-wellness-program%e2%80%99s-compliance-with-the-ada/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/litigation/judge-dismisses-challenge-to-wellness-program%e2%80%99s-compliance-with-the-ada/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 01:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wellness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=6310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[www.millerjohnson.com     April 25, 2011  On April 11, 2011, the Southern District of Florida upheld an employer health plan’s wellness program despite a former plan participant’s claim that it violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”).  The decision, Seff v. Broward County, finally provides some guidance for employers who have struggled with the ADA’s prohibition on [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/litigation/judge-dismisses-challenge-to-wellness-program%e2%80%99s-compliance-with-the-ada/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Defendant’s Counterclaim Dismissed In Provider Reimbursement Dispute</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/litigation/defendant%e2%80%99s-counterclaim-dismissed-in-provider-reimbursement-dispute/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/litigation/defendant%e2%80%99s-counterclaim-dismissed-in-provider-reimbursement-dispute/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 13:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Provider Reimbursement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=4822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[www.healthplanlaw.com January 31, 2011 • Under ordinary circumstances, the Court likely would not require a party making a breach of contract claim to identify the contractual terms on which it relies; alleging the nature of the breach would be enough. In this case, however, Regence’s claim is premised not on one or a small number [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/litigation/defendant%e2%80%99s-counterclaim-dismissed-in-provider-reimbursement-dispute/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Attachment Of Proof Of Benefit Assignment May Prove Critical To Removal</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/erisa/attachment-of-proof-of-benefit-assignment-may-prove-critical-to-removal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/erisa/attachment-of-proof-of-benefit-assignment-may-prove-critical-to-removal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 13:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ERISA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Circuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Preemption]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=4820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[www.healthplanlaw.com January 26, 2011 • The second prong of the Pascack test is also satisfied. Plaintiff identifies no other “independent legal duty” that would support its claims. Plaintiff’s argument that this is a “rate of payment” case is of no avail. 6 Plaintiff admits that it has no contractual relationship with any Defendants. At the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/erisa/attachment-of-proof-of-benefit-assignment-may-prove-critical-to-removal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Discovery Permitted To Determine Scope Of Administrative Record</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/claims-procedures/discovery-permitted-to-determine-scope-of-administrative-record/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/claims-procedures/discovery-permitted-to-determine-scope-of-administrative-record/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 13:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Claims Procedures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Claims Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ERISA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=4814</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[www.healthplanlaw.com January 18, 2011 In the present case, the plaintiff asserts its procedural challenge on the grounds that, given the different versions of the administrative record produced during discovery, many of which lacked important medical records initially provided by the plaintiff, it is impossible to determine what comprises the full administrative record on which the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/claims-procedures/discovery-permitted-to-determine-scope-of-administrative-record/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Medical marijuana laws create dilemma for firms</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/litigation/medical-marijuana-laws-create-dilemma-for-firms/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/litigation/medical-marijuana-laws-create-dilemma-for-firms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 15:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam V. Russo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=2130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Judy Greenwald Employers are facing the challenge of maintaining a safe workplace while more states legalize the use of medical marijuana, experts say. While courts generally have ruled that firms do not have to accommodate medical marijuana users, employers in some jurisdictions still are awaiting guidance on the issue. Furthermore, all employers must guard against [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/litigation/medical-marijuana-laws-create-dilemma-for-firms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Medicare gets aggressive in drive to recoup medical costs</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/litigation/medicare-gets-aggressive-in-drive-to-recoup-medical-costs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/litigation/medicare-gets-aggressive-in-drive-to-recoup-medical-costs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 13:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam V. Russo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=2024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Roberto Ceniceros The U.S. government&#8217;s first-of-its-kind lawsuit against all parties that settled a pollution liability case signals Medicare&#8217;s aggressive push to make sure it does not pay medical expenses when others are to be the primary sources of payment, observers say. The suit filed Dec. 1, 2009, cites Medicare Secondary Payer provisions in federal law [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/litigation/medicare-gets-aggressive-in-drive-to-recoup-medical-costs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blue Cross Accused of Deceptive Practices</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/erisa/blue-cross-accused-of-deceptive-practices/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/erisa/blue-cross-accused-of-deceptive-practices/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam V. Russo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ERISA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiduciary Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=1348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Tim Hull, Courthouse News Service, www.courthousenews.com LOS ANGELES (CN) &#8211; A federal accuses Blue Cross of a wide-ranging scheme to underpay claims from out-of-network hospitals. Methodist Hospital of Southern California claims Blue Cross refuses to let it transfer patients from emergency rooms, then underpays the hospital and sticks patients with hefty bills, falsely claiming [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/erisa/blue-cross-accused-of-deceptive-practices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

