<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Passion for Subro &#187; Fiduciary Liability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.passionforsubro.com/category/fiduciary-liability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com</link>
	<description>The personal subrogation blog of Attorney Adam V. Russo.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:03:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Legal considerations when implementing on-site clinics</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/erisa/legal-considerations-when-implementing-on-site-clinics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/erisa/legal-considerations-when-implementing-on-site-clinics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 01:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ERISA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiduciary Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=8680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On-site clinics utilized in conjunction with a group health plan are becoming an increasingly common method to help employers address the rising cost of health care.  The issues in implementing an on-site clinic may seem obvious:  Finding a service provider; installing an appropriate facility; and addressing employee access during work hours. However, there are less [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/erisa/legal-considerations-when-implementing-on-site-clinics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fiduciary Duties Not Implicated In Managed Care Rate Negotiations</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/fiduciary-liability/fiduciary-duties-not-implicated-in-managed-care-rate-negotiations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/fiduciary-liability/fiduciary-duties-not-implicated-in-managed-care-rate-negotiations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam V. Russo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fiduciary Liability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=4396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Roy Harmon III, www.healthplanlaw.com Thus, in a nutshell, Blue Cross lowered rates for its own subsidiary by effectively raising them for Flagstar and other self-insured plans. The letter agreements between Blue Cross and the hospitals spell out these facts in black and white. But that does not mean that Flagstar knew about the deals. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/fiduciary-liability/fiduciary-duties-not-implicated-in-managed-care-rate-negotiations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TPA Fails in Effort to Remove Case to Federal Court</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/erisa/tpa-fails-in-effort-to-remove-case-to-federal-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/erisa/tpa-fails-in-effort-to-remove-case-to-federal-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 19:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam V. Russo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ERISA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiduciary Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stop Loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Third Party Administrators]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=4290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MyHealthGuide, www.myhealthguide.com MyHealthGuide Source: Tom Croft, Esq., King &#38; Croft LLP, 11/18/2010 www.StopLossLaw.com Case: Hornady Manufacturing Co. v. Perico Life Ins. Co., et al. No. 8: 10CV150, in the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska, 9/22/2010) Court&#8217;s Opinion Mr. Croft&#8217;s Comment: It never ceases to amaze me how the myth that somehow [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/erisa/tpa-fails-in-effort-to-remove-case-to-federal-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Fiduciary&#8217; Definition Proposed by EBSA for Employee Benefit Plans</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/erisa/fiduciary-definition-proposed-by-ebsa-for-employee-benefit-plans/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/erisa/fiduciary-definition-proposed-by-ebsa-for-employee-benefit-plans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 13:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam V. Russo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ERISA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiduciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiduciary Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Welfare Benefit Plans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=4131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MyHealthGuide, www.myhealthguide.com Washington &#8212; The U.S. Department of Labor&#8217;s Employee Benefits Security Administration today announced a proposed rule to update the definition of &#8220;fiduciary&#8221; to more broadly define the term as a person who provides investment advice to plans for a fee or other compensation. The department&#8217;s proposed rule would amend a 1975 regulation that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/erisa/fiduciary-definition-proposed-by-ebsa-for-employee-benefit-plans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The PPO Value Proposition: A Roundtable Discussion for Plan Sponsors</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/fiduciary-liability/the-ppo-value-proposition-a-roundtable-discussion-for-plan-sponsors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/fiduciary-liability/the-ppo-value-proposition-a-roundtable-discussion-for-plan-sponsors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 14:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam V. Russo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fiduciary Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Provider Reimbursement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Third Party Agreements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=2906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Introduction Over the course of the past several years, the value proposition of Preferred Provider Organizations (PPOs) has come under increasing scrutiny. Many have thought that if price can be controlled, health care costs can be controlled or at least mitigated. The truth is that health care costs are an intricate and complex balancing act [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/fiduciary-liability/the-ppo-value-proposition-a-roundtable-discussion-for-plan-sponsors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coming Soon: Broader Definition of Fiduciary Under ERISA</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/erisa/coming-soon-broader-definition-of-fiduciary-under-erisa/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/erisa/coming-soon-broader-definition-of-fiduciary-under-erisa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 15:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam V. Russo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ERISA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiduciary Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care Legislation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=1932</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Worried the current regulation may limit investment advice, Labor Department hopes to amend definition by June by Jessica Toonkel Marquez, Investment News www.investmentnews.com The Labor Department is planning to expand its definition of fiduciary under ERISA — a move that would have implications for all financial advisers that work on retirement plans. According to an [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/erisa/coming-soon-broader-definition-of-fiduciary-under-erisa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fiduciary Liabilities: Are You Covered?</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/erisa/fiduciary-liabilities-are-you-covered/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/erisa/fiduciary-liabilities-are-you-covered/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam V. Russo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ERISA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiduciary Liability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=1778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With lawsuits piling up against pension plan sponsors, individual fiduciaries would do well to protect themselves against financial risks, experts say. Randy Myers &#8211; CFO.com &#124; US November 19, 2009 If you are a fiduciary for your employer&#8217;s retirement savings plan, you already know that life isn&#8217;t getting any simpler. Lawsuits against plan fiduciaries are [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/erisa/fiduciary-liabilities-are-you-covered/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blue Cross Accused of Deceptive Practices</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/erisa/blue-cross-accused-of-deceptive-practices/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/erisa/blue-cross-accused-of-deceptive-practices/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam V. Russo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ERISA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiduciary Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=1348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Tim Hull, Courthouse News Service, www.courthousenews.com LOS ANGELES (CN) &#8211; A federal accuses Blue Cross of a wide-ranging scheme to underpay claims from out-of-network hospitals. Methodist Hospital of Southern California claims Blue Cross refuses to let it transfer patients from emergency rooms, then underpays the hospital and sticks patients with hefty bills, falsely claiming [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/erisa/blue-cross-accused-of-deceptive-practices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Equitable Relief</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/fiduciary-liability/equitable-relief-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/fiduciary-liability/equitable-relief-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 13:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam V. Russo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[10th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiduciary Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plan Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summary Plan Description]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=1273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Administrative Committee of the Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Gamboa, 479 F.3d 538 (8th Cir. 2007), an ERISA plan administrator brought suit seeking equitable reimbursement from a plan participant who had received a settlement from a tortfeasor. Although the reimbursement provision was contained in an SPD for a health plan, the employer had no formal [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/fiduciary-liability/equitable-relief-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Indiana Employer Wins Mixed Ruling in Benefits Case</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/erisa/indiana-employer-wins-mixed-ruling-in-benefits-case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/erisa/indiana-employer-wins-mixed-ruling-in-benefits-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 17:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam V. Russo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[7th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ERISA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiduciary Liability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=998</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Fred Schneyer of PLANSPONSOR, www.plansponsor.com An Indiana manufacturer has received a mixed ruling from a federal judge in a lawsuit alleging its misdeeds in the handling of its benefits program constituted a fiduciary breach. While U.S. District Judge Philip P. Simon of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana threw out [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/erisa/indiana-employer-wins-mixed-ruling-in-benefits-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

