<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Passion for Subro &#187; Washington D.C.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.passionforsubro.com/category/federal-circuits/washington-dc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com</link>
	<description>The personal subrogation blog of Attorney Adam V. Russo.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:35:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Decision on Health Reform Will Give Clarity to Business</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/4th/supreme-court-decision-on-health-reform-will-give-clarity-to-business/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/4th/supreme-court-decision-on-health-reform-will-give-clarity-to-business/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 01:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[11th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPACA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington D.C.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=8291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Employer’s Guide to Self-Insuring Health Benefits     December 2011 &#124; Vol. 19, No.3  The U.S. Supreme Court definitively announced on Nov. 14 it will decide the question of whether Congress exceeded its powers to regulate commerce when it decided to require people to buy health insurance (that is, whether the individual mandate is allowed under the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/4th/supreme-court-decision-on-health-reform-will-give-clarity-to-business/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>State Health Care Reform Update</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/washington-dc/state-health-care-reform-update-19/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/washington-dc/state-health-care-reform-update-19/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 17:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam V. Russo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louisiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington D.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=3622</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CCH® BENEFITS, www.hr.cch.com California The California Public Employee’s Retirement System (CalPERS) has approved an average increase of more than 9% in health premiums next year for state and local government workers. CalPERS blamed the rate increase on rising costs for hospital care, doctor visits, and prescriptions. The increase will mean higher premiums for public agencies [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/washington-dc/state-health-care-reform-update-19/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From the Bench</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/erisa/from-the-bench/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/erisa/from-the-bench/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam V. Russo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ERISA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Preemption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington D.C.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=1148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by John H. Eggertsen, Esq. and Michael Friedman, Esq. of SIIA, www.siia.org I. District of Columbia&#8217;s Efforts to Regulate PBMs Preempted by ERISA In their efforts to combat the ongoing initiatives on the part of several states to regulate the business activities of pharmacy benefit managers (&#8220;PBMs&#8221;), the PBMs recently won a skirmish. In Pharmaceutical [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/erisa/from-the-bench/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

