<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Passion for Subro &#187; 6th</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.passionforsubro.com/category/federal-circuits/6th/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com</link>
	<description>The personal subrogation blog of Attorney Adam V. Russo.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:03:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Invalid FMLA certification can form the basis of employment termination.</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/6th/invalid-fmla-certification-can-form-the-basis-of-employment-termination/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/6th/invalid-fmla-certification-can-form-the-basis-of-employment-termination/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 00:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[6th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FMLA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=8367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In order to support a valid claim of retaliation under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), an employee must demonstrate that the reason given for an adverse employment action was pretextual, and that the employee’s request for or use of FMLA leave was the actual basis of the action. The 6th U.S. Circuit Court [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/6th/invalid-fmla-certification-can-form-the-basis-of-employment-termination/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court Foils Latest Attempt to Argue Stop-loss Converts Self-funded Plans Into Fully Insured</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/erisa/court-foils-latest-attempt-to-argue-stop-loss-converts-self-funded-plans-into-fully-insured/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/erisa/court-foils-latest-attempt-to-argue-stop-loss-converts-self-funded-plans-into-fully-insured/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 01:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[3rd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ERISA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Preemption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self-Funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stop Loss]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=8299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Employer’s Guide to Self-Insuring Health Benefits      December 2011 &#124; Vol. 19, No.3  The attempted treatment of stop-loss coverage as “health insurance” subject to state insurance law has been a thorn in the sides of self-funded plans seeking to maintain ERISA preemption of state insurance laws.  In Goyen v. Vail Corp., 2011 WL 4479091 (D. Colo., [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/erisa/court-foils-latest-attempt-to-argue-stop-loss-converts-self-funded-plans-into-fully-insured/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Five Key Lines in the Circuit Court Rulings on Reform</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/4th/five-key-lines-in-the-circuit-court-rulings-on-reform/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/4th/five-key-lines-in-the-circuit-court-rulings-on-reform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 12:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[11th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care Legislation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=7836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is the Affordable Care Act constitutional or not?  It seems like every week brings a different wrinkle, if not a new answer.  The Supreme Court will convene on Thursday to decide whether to take up the case against reform. The universal expectation is that the high court will elect to grant certiorari, rather than avoid [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/4th/five-key-lines-in-the-circuit-court-rulings-on-reform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Court of Appeals Affirms Plan’s Right to Reimbursement</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/6th/u-s-court-of-appeals-affirms-plan%e2%80%99s-right-to-reimbursement-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/6th/u-s-court-of-appeals-affirms-plan%e2%80%99s-right-to-reimbursement-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 17:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[6th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reimbursement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=7303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Coordination of Benefits Employee Benefits Series  THOMPSON  July 2011 &#124; VOL. 19, No.3 Legal Brief A recent decision by a U.S. appeals court upheld a recovery in which a plan dealt directly with the auto liability insurer to achieve a recovery. The case is Shaffer v. Rawlings Co., 2011 WL 1977252 (6th Cir., May 18, 2011). The [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/6th/u-s-court-of-appeals-affirms-plan%e2%80%99s-right-to-reimbursement-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>4th Circuit Appeals Court Rejects Virginia, Liberty University Challenges To Health Law</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/4th/4th-circuit-appeals-court-rejects-virginia-liberty-university-challenges-to-health-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/4th/4th-circuit-appeals-court-rejects-virginia-liberty-university-challenges-to-health-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 16:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[11th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=7226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sep 08, 2011 The Virginia case, brought by state Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli, was considered one of the highest profile health law challenges to the health law. In its opinion, issued today, the appellate court ruled that the state does not have standing to challenge the law&#8217;s individual mandate because it lacks &#8220;a personal stake.&#8221; It also concluded that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/4th/4th-circuit-appeals-court-rejects-virginia-liberty-university-challenges-to-health-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Court of Appeals Affirms Plan’s Right to Reimbursement</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/erisa/u-s-court-of-appeals-affirms-plan%e2%80%99s-right-to-reimbursement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/erisa/u-s-court-of-appeals-affirms-plan%e2%80%99s-right-to-reimbursement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 00:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[6th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ERISA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reimbursement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=7123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Coordination of Benefits    Employee Benefits Series             THOMPSON            July 2011 &#124; VOL. 19, No.3 Legal Brief  A recent decision by a U.S. appeals court upheld a recovery in which a plan dealt directly with the auto liability insurer to achieve a recovery. The case is Shaffer v. Rawlings Co., 2011 WL 1977252 (6th Cir., May 18, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/erisa/u-s-court-of-appeals-affirms-plan%e2%80%99s-right-to-reimbursement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal Court Grants Summary Judgment to Stop Loss Carrier in Eligibility Case</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/stop-loss/federal-court-grants-summary-judgment-to-stop-loss-carrier-in-eligibility-case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/stop-loss/federal-court-grants-summary-judgment-to-stop-loss-carrier-in-eligibility-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 13:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[6th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stop Loss]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=7075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[www.myhealthguide.com MyHealthGuide Source: Thomas Croft, Esq., King &#38; Croft LLP, 8/17/2011, www.StopLossLaw.com Case: Bekaert Corp. v. Standard Security Life Ins. Co of New York., No.5:09CV2903, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, 8/15/2011.  Court&#8217;s Opinion. Mr. Croft&#8217;s Comment: This is the second federal decision rejecting a group&#8217;s unreasonable interpretation of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/stop-loss/federal-court-grants-summary-judgment-to-stop-loss-carrier-in-eligibility-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal Court Decides Eligibility Issue in Favor of Stop Loss Carrier</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/stop-loss/federal-court-decides-eligibility-issue-in-favor-of-stop-loss-carrier/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/stop-loss/federal-court-decides-eligibility-issue-in-favor-of-stop-loss-carrier/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 17:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[6th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stop Loss]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=6852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[www.myhealthguide.com MyHealthGuide Source: Thomas Croft, Esq., King &#38; Croft LLP, 7/15/2011, www.StopLossLaw.com Case: Clarcor, Inc. v. Madison National Life Ins. Co., No. 3:10-189, in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, July 11, 2011). Court&#8217;s Opinion. CComment by Mr. Croft: The Court got this one right. Clarcor sued Madison National, the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/stop-loss/federal-court-decides-eligibility-issue-in-favor-of-stop-loss-carrier/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First Appellate Court Ruling Finds PPACA Constitutional</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/6th/first-appellate-court-ruling-finds-ppaca-constitutional/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/6th/first-appellate-court-ruling-finds-ppaca-constitutional/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 15:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[6th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPACA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=6841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[www.hrpolicy.org      July 8, 2011     In the first decision from a federal appeals court on the health care reform law, the Sixth Circuit concluded that the individual mandate in the health care reform law is constitutional.  The ruling in Thomas More Law Center v. Obama came as no surprise, given the judges’ expressed skepticism during [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/6th/first-appellate-court-ruling-finds-ppaca-constitutional/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ruling On Reform Law Needs To Come Quickly</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/6th/ruling-on-reform-law-needs-to-come-quickly/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/6th/ruling-on-reform-law-needs-to-come-quickly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 22:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[6th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care Legislation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=6813</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[www.businessinsurance.com    July 4 &#38; 11, 2011 IS THE HEALTH CARE reform law constitutional? That&#8217;s the question courts have faced since Congress passed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and President Barack Obama signed it into law last year. In the highest-level court decision so far, the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled last [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/6th/ruling-on-reform-law-needs-to-come-quickly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

