<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Passion for Subro &#187; 4th</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.passionforsubro.com/category/federal-circuits/4th/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com</link>
	<description>The personal subrogation blog of Attorney Adam V. Russo.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:03:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Administrator Flubs Stop-loss Claim; State-law Charges on Administrator Not Preempted</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/erisa/administrator-flubs-stop-loss-claim-state-law-charges-on-administrator-not-preempted/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/erisa/administrator-flubs-stop-loss-claim-state-law-charges-on-administrator-not-preempted/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 15:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[4th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ERISA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Preemption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stop Loss]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=8473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Employer’s Guide to Self-Insuring Health Benefits        January 2012 &#124; Vol. 19, No. 4  A claims administrator lost an attempt to dismiss negligence and breach of contract charges relating to its failure to process and pay a large claim before the final day of a stop-loss policy’s run-out period.  The self-insured Hebrew Home health plan sued [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/erisa/administrator-flubs-stop-loss-claim-state-law-charges-on-administrator-not-preempted/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Decision on Health Reform Will Give Clarity to Business</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/4th/supreme-court-decision-on-health-reform-will-give-clarity-to-business/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/4th/supreme-court-decision-on-health-reform-will-give-clarity-to-business/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 01:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[11th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPACA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington D.C.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=8291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Employer’s Guide to Self-Insuring Health Benefits     December 2011 &#124; Vol. 19, No.3  The U.S. Supreme Court definitively announced on Nov. 14 it will decide the question of whether Congress exceeded its powers to regulate commerce when it decided to require people to buy health insurance (that is, whether the individual mandate is allowed under the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/4th/supreme-court-decision-on-health-reform-will-give-clarity-to-business/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stop-loss Insurance and Self-insuring: Will Regulators Ever Understand It?</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/erisa/stop-loss-insurance-and-self-insuring-will-regulators-ever-understand-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/erisa/stop-loss-insurance-and-self-insuring-will-regulators-ever-understand-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 00:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[3rd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ERISA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPACA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self-Funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stop Loss]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=7856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Employer’s Guide to Self-Insuring Health Benefits Thompson Publishing                  November 2011      Vol. 19, No. 2 The federal agencies in charge of implementing health reform and the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) keep saying stop-loss policies with low attachment points mean an employer-sponsored health plan is really not self-funded. Contributing Editor Adam V. Russo and Attorney [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/erisa/stop-loss-insurance-and-self-insuring-will-regulators-ever-understand-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Five Key Lines in the Circuit Court Rulings on Reform</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/4th/five-key-lines-in-the-circuit-court-rulings-on-reform/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/4th/five-key-lines-in-the-circuit-court-rulings-on-reform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 12:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[11th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care Legislation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=7836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is the Affordable Care Act constitutional or not?  It seems like every week brings a different wrinkle, if not a new answer.  The Supreme Court will convene on Thursday to decide whether to take up the case against reform. The universal expectation is that the high court will elect to grant certiorari, rather than avoid [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/4th/five-key-lines-in-the-circuit-court-rulings-on-reform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Virginia University Petitions Supreme Court for Health Care Suit Review</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/4th/virginia-university-petitions-supreme-court-for-health-care-suit-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/4th/virginia-university-petitions-supreme-court-for-health-care-suit-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 11:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[4th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=7553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[www.foxnews.com Published October 10, 2011 &#124; FoxNews.com A Virginia university is the latest party to request the Supreme Court step in and resolve the multifront legal brawl over the constitutionality of President Obama&#8217;s health care overhaul.  Liberty University, a private Christian university founded by the late Jerry Falwell, asked on Monday for the high court [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/4th/virginia-university-petitions-supreme-court-for-health-care-suit-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Path Set For ACA? Proponents, Foes Of Law Appeal To Supreme Court</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/4th/path-set-for-aca-proponents-foes-of-law-appeal-to-supreme-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/4th/path-set-for-aca-proponents-foes-of-law-appeal-to-supreme-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 23:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[11th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPACA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=7509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[www.modernhealthcare.com By Joe Carlson       October 3, 2011 The U.S. Justice Department charted a legal course last week that could produce a final decision on the constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act in the heat of the 2012 presidential campaign. Attorneys for the Justice Department filed their formal petition Aug. 28 for oral [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/4th/path-set-for-aca-proponents-foes-of-law-appeal-to-supreme-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals Dismisses Challenges to the PPACA’s Individual Mandate</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/4th/fourth-circuit-court-of-appeals-dismisses-challenges-to-the-ppaca%e2%80%99s-individual-mandate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/4th/fourth-circuit-court-of-appeals-dismisses-challenges-to-the-ppaca%e2%80%99s-individual-mandate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 00:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[4th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care Legislation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=7381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[www.towerswatson.com September 2011 On procedural and jurisdictional grounds, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed two cases challenging the individual mandate provision in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA). First, in Virginia ex rel. Cuccinelli v. Sebelius, the Fourth Circuit Court held that Virginia lacked &#8220;standing&#8221; to bring the lawsuit [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/4th/fourth-circuit-court-of-appeals-dismisses-challenges-to-the-ppaca%e2%80%99s-individual-mandate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>4th Circuit Appeals Court Rejects Virginia, Liberty University Challenges To Health Law</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/4th/4th-circuit-appeals-court-rejects-virginia-liberty-university-challenges-to-health-law-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/4th/4th-circuit-appeals-court-rejects-virginia-liberty-university-challenges-to-health-law-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 01:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[4th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=7256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[www.kaiserhealthnews.com    Sep 08, 2011 The Virginia case, brought by state Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli, was considered one of the highest profile health law challenges to the health law. In its opinion, issued today, the appellate court ruled that the state does not have standing to challenge the law&#8217;s individual mandate because it lacks &#8220;a personal stake.&#8221; It also concluded [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/4th/4th-circuit-appeals-court-rejects-virginia-liberty-university-challenges-to-health-law-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>4th Circuit Appeals Court Rejects Virginia, Liberty University Challenges To Health Law</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/4th/4th-circuit-appeals-court-rejects-virginia-liberty-university-challenges-to-health-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/4th/4th-circuit-appeals-court-rejects-virginia-liberty-university-challenges-to-health-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 16:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[11th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=7226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sep 08, 2011 The Virginia case, brought by state Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli, was considered one of the highest profile health law challenges to the health law. In its opinion, issued today, the appellate court ruled that the state does not have standing to challenge the law&#8217;s individual mandate because it lacks &#8220;a personal stake.&#8221; It also concluded that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/4th/4th-circuit-appeals-court-rejects-virginia-liberty-university-challenges-to-health-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ERISA-A Reminder About Who Can Sue</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/erisa/erisa-a-reminder-about-who-can-sue/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/erisa/erisa-a-reminder-about-who-can-sue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[4th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ERISA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=7040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[www.erisalawyerblog.com     By Stanley D. Baum    August 4, 2011  In Malkani v. Clark Consulting, Incorporated, No. 10-2008 (4th Cir. 2011) (Unpublished Opinion), the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reminds us about who can sue under ERISA. In this case, Plaintiffs Roma P. Malkani (&#8220;Malkani&#8221;) and Information Systems and Networks Corporation (&#8220;ISN&#8221;) had brought an action against [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/erisa/erisa-a-reminder-about-who-can-sue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

