<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Passion for Subro &#187; 11th</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.passionforsubro.com/category/federal-circuits/11/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com</link>
	<description>The personal subrogation blog of Attorney Adam V. Russo.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:03:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Pregnant Employee Terminated Prior to Becoming Eligible for Leave Can State Causes of Action Under FMLA</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/11/pregnant-employee-terminated-prior-to-becoming-eligible-for-leave-can-state-causes-of-action-under-fmla/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/11/pregnant-employee-terminated-prior-to-becoming-eligible-for-leave-can-state-causes-of-action-under-fmla/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 21:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[11th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FMLA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=8563</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals recently held in a case of first impression in this circuit that the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) “protects a pre-eligibility request for post-eligibility leave.” That is, the FMLA protects an employee who gives notice, before she is eligible for leave, of intent to take FMLA leave for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/11/pregnant-employee-terminated-prior-to-becoming-eligible-for-leave-can-state-causes-of-action-under-fmla/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Decision on Health Reform Will Give Clarity to Business</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/4th/supreme-court-decision-on-health-reform-will-give-clarity-to-business/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/4th/supreme-court-decision-on-health-reform-will-give-clarity-to-business/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 01:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[11th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPACA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington D.C.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=8291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Employer’s Guide to Self-Insuring Health Benefits     December 2011 &#124; Vol. 19, No.3  The U.S. Supreme Court definitively announced on Nov. 14 it will decide the question of whether Congress exceeded its powers to regulate commerce when it decided to require people to buy health insurance (that is, whether the individual mandate is allowed under the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/4th/supreme-court-decision-on-health-reform-will-give-clarity-to-business/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amicus Committee Update</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/erisa/amicus-committee-update-4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/erisa/amicus-committee-update-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 18:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[11th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3rd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ERISA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reimbursement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=7905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[THIRD CIRCUIT HOLDS THAT ERISA PLANS REIMBURSEMENT CLAIMS ARE SUBJECT TO EQUITABLE DEFENSES AND LIMITATIONS On November 16, 2011, the Third Circuit held in US Airways, Inc. v. McCutchen, that an ERISA plan’s claims for reimbursement under ERISA §502(a)(3) are subject to equitable limitations and defenses.      The matter involved a self-funded ERISA plan which had [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/erisa/amicus-committee-update-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Five Key Lines in the Circuit Court Rulings on Reform</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/4th/five-key-lines-in-the-circuit-court-rulings-on-reform/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/4th/five-key-lines-in-the-circuit-court-rulings-on-reform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 12:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[11th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care Legislation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=7836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is the Affordable Care Act constitutional or not?  It seems like every week brings a different wrinkle, if not a new answer.  The Supreme Court will convene on Thursday to decide whether to take up the case against reform. The universal expectation is that the high court will elect to grant certiorari, rather than avoid [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/4th/five-key-lines-in-the-circuit-court-rulings-on-reform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Path Set For ACA? Proponents, Foes Of Law Appeal To Supreme Court</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/4th/path-set-for-aca-proponents-foes-of-law-appeal-to-supreme-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/4th/path-set-for-aca-proponents-foes-of-law-appeal-to-supreme-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 23:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[11th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPACA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=7509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[www.modernhealthcare.com By Joe Carlson       October 3, 2011 The U.S. Justice Department charted a legal course last week that could produce a final decision on the constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act in the heat of the 2012 presidential campaign. Attorneys for the Justice Department filed their formal petition Aug. 28 for oral [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/4th/path-set-for-aca-proponents-foes-of-law-appeal-to-supreme-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Obamacare&#8217; Closer to Supreme Court Review After Administration Declines to Appeal Latest Ruling</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/11/obamacare-closer-to-supreme-court-review-after-administration-declines-to-appeal-latest-ruling/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/11/obamacare-closer-to-supreme-court-review-after-administration-declines-to-appeal-latest-ruling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 11:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[11th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care Legislation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=7415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[www.foxnews.com Published September 26, 2011 &#124; Associated Press The Obama administration has decided not to ask a federal appeals court in Atlanta for further review of a ruling striking down the centerpiece of President Barack Obama&#8217;s sweeping health care overhaul.The administration&#8217;s decision makes it more likely that the U.S. Supreme Court would hear a case [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/11/obamacare-closer-to-supreme-court-review-after-administration-declines-to-appeal-latest-ruling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Obamacare&#8217;s a Legal Loser: Virginia Court Ruling Says Nothing About Law&#8217;s Constitutionality</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/11/why-obamacares-a-legal-loser-virginia-court-ruling-says-nothing-about-laws-constitutionality/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/11/why-obamacares-a-legal-loser-virginia-court-ruling-says-nothing-about-laws-constitutionality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 23:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[11th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=7368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[www.nydailynews.com By Betsy Mccaughey    Wednesday, September 14th 2011 Contrary to the headlines, the 4th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals did not &#8220;uphold&#8221; the constitutionality of the Obama health law&#8217;s mandatory insurance provision last week. The court dismissed the Virginia challenge for technical reasons but made a point of saying that the health law raises important [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/11/why-obamacares-a-legal-loser-virginia-court-ruling-says-nothing-about-laws-constitutionality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>4th Circuit Appeals Court Rejects Virginia, Liberty University Challenges To Health Law</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/4th/4th-circuit-appeals-court-rejects-virginia-liberty-university-challenges-to-health-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/4th/4th-circuit-appeals-court-rejects-virginia-liberty-university-challenges-to-health-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 16:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[11th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=7226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sep 08, 2011 The Virginia case, brought by state Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli, was considered one of the highest profile health law challenges to the health law. In its opinion, issued today, the appellate court ruled that the state does not have standing to challenge the law&#8217;s individual mandate because it lacks &#8220;a personal stake.&#8221; It also concluded that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/4th/4th-circuit-appeals-court-rejects-virginia-liberty-university-challenges-to-health-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eleventh Circuit: Individual Mandate Is Unconstitutional; Other Provisions Remain</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/11/7186/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/11/7186/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 01:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[11th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care Legislation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=7186</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[www.ebia.com  From the August 18, 2011 EBIA Weekly  [State of Florida ex rel. Atty. Gen. v. HHS, 2011 WL 3519178 (11th Cir. 2011)]  Available at http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/courts/ca11/201111021.pdf  The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals has held that Congress exceeded its power to regulate interstate commerce when it enacted health care reform’s individual mandate, which beginning in 2014 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/11/7186/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Next Stop, SCOTUS? Conflict on PPACA’s Individual Mandate Arises Among Federal Appeals Courts</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/11/next-stop-scotus-conflict-on-ppaca%e2%80%99s-individual-mandate-arises-among-federal-appeals-courts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/11/next-stop-scotus-conflict-on-ppaca%e2%80%99s-individual-mandate-arises-among-federal-appeals-courts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 00:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmonfils</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[11th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPACA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=7095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[www.eforerisa.com           August 14, 2011  On August 12, 2011, a three-justice panel of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta ruled that the PPACA’s individual mandate violated the Commerce Clause of the Constitution, which protects state commerce from federal regulation. In deeming the mandate to be unconstitutional, the 11th Circuit contradicted an earlier ruling [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/federal-circuits/11/next-stop-scotus-conflict-on-ppaca%e2%80%99s-individual-mandate-arises-among-federal-appeals-courts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

