<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Passion for Subro &#187; 1st</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.passionforsubro.com/category/federal-circuits/1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com</link>
	<description>The personal subrogation blog of Attorney Adam V. Russo.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:03:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>First Circuit Permits § 502(a)(3) Recoupment Claim Despite Failure To Identify “Specific Account” Holding Funds</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/erisa/first-circuit-permits-%c2%a7-502a3-recoupment-claim-despite-failure-to-identify-%e2%80%9cspecific-account%e2%80%9d-holding-funds/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/erisa/first-circuit-permits-%c2%a7-502a3-recoupment-claim-despite-failure-to-identify-%e2%80%9cspecific-account%e2%80%9d-holding-funds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam V. Russo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ERISA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=2061</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a huge win for the subrogation industry. The court held that Sereboff, rather than Knudson, controlled in this case. Like in Sereboff, the Plan targeted specific funds for recovery , Cusson’s LTD payments, and identified the specific portion to which Liberty is entitled— the amount of the overpayment while Cusson was receiving benefits [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/erisa/first-circuit-permits-%c2%a7-502a3-recoupment-claim-despite-failure-to-identify-%e2%80%9cspecific-account%e2%80%9d-holding-funds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From the Bench</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/erisa/from-the-bench/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/erisa/from-the-bench/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam V. Russo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ERISA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Preemption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington D.C.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=1148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by John H. Eggertsen, Esq. and Michael Friedman, Esq. of SIIA, www.siia.org I. District of Columbia&#8217;s Efforts to Regulate PBMs Preempted by ERISA In their efforts to combat the ongoing initiatives on the part of several states to regulate the business activities of pharmacy benefit managers (&#8220;PBMs&#8221;), the PBMs recently won a skirmish. In Pharmaceutical [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/erisa/from-the-bench/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>1st Circuit Tweaks Benefits Denial Case Law</title>
		<link>http://www.passionforsubro.com/claims-review/1st-circuit-tweaks-benefits-denial-case-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.passionforsubro.com/claims-review/1st-circuit-tweaks-benefits-denial-case-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 17:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam V. Russo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Claims Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passionforsubro.com/?p=1001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Fred Schneyer of PLANSPONSOR, www.plansponsor.com After tweaking their standard for how federal judges should handle employee benefits denial cases involving a conflicted plan administrator, federal appellate judges have ordered more hearings in just such a case. The 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals sent back to a lower court Denmark v. Liberty Life Assurance [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.passionforsubro.com/claims-review/1st-circuit-tweaks-benefits-denial-case-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

